I’ve mentioned before that barrels aren’t difficult to make once the tooling has been mastered. Actions are a bit more awkward. But some are easier than others. Depends on the intended purpose of the rifle. A friend of mine has a very nice little single shot in 357 Mag built on a Cadet Martini action. Bill Holmes, he who wrote those excellent books on DIY gun making, has built successful falling block actions. I saw photos of them in an article but I can’t remember where. One had a round breech block. Very much easier to make than the rectangular type. Indeed the difference is of the order of dead simple compared with almost impossible.
The downside of the round breech block is it’s reduced strength compared with the rectangular type. It is therefore considered suitable only for low pressure cartridges. But I wonder. A 20mm diameter breech block in an action of sufficient wall thickness should be a lot stronger than many light framed 357 Mag revolvers. The sectional area of the locking lugs of most bolt actions is much less and they are good for centre fire rifle pressures. The round breech block would need testing but I suspect it’s good for most anything. Should certainly be good for 357 Mag, and a lot of useful rifle cartridges like the 30-30 have chamber pressures not much higher than the 357 Mag.
In any case, with BP loads which are all low pressure, the simple round block design has a lot of potential. Just another idea y’all might like to toss around.
For the really ambitious, a book was published in the US not long ago devoted entirely to the construction of a hammerless falling block action that looks every bit as good as the Ruger No 1. It is very detailed and complete. I know, because I have it. It was serialised in a machining magazine to which I subscribe and later published as an individual book. Anybody who wants to know where to get it can contact me off list.
There are all kinds of possibilities in an all out survival situation. I’m sure I’m not the only one who knows about a single shot deringer that is loaded with BP and ball by unscrewing the barrel, loading powder and ball and screwing back on. Only one shot, but that’s a whole lot better than nothing. The beauty is in the simplicity, and they are smal so two or three could be carried.
A muzzle loading version of the famous Remington o/u deringer would be a nice idea. Two shots and small enough to carry two or three. Yeah, I know it wouldn’t be legal if it’s not an exact copy of anything. That’s not the point. The point is simplicity, smallness and concealment. The trick is to get the trigger design to work, something simpler and easier to make than the Remington trigger.
Who’s familiar with the little North American Arms revolver in 22LR and 22Mag ? I’ve fired one once. Well it was a whole morning session teaching it’s owner how to handle it. As I’d never fired one I taught as I learned. Fortunately the owner didn’t notice. It shot very nicely, tight little groups at five metres which is about as far as it is likely to be used. Very small, lovely for carry. You know the rule, a small gun carried is worth a lot more than a big one left home. In future concealability might be more important than in the past for reasons that need not be discussed here. It occured to me that such a revolver, five shots in 32 S&W long loaded with wadcutters in front of a stiff charge would be almost as small and quite useful, and not dependent on factory ammo. How do you reload a small single action revolver without a swing out cylinder. You don’t, you carry a spare cylinder and learn how to switch them quickly in the dark.
[Originally posted to SATalkGuns -- Admin]